SI and Bklyn residents protest congestion pricing plan
(Staten Island) Democratic Congressional Candidate Steve Harrison (NY 13th CD, Staten Island and Southwest Brooklyn) will lead a group of Staten Island and Brooklyn residents protesting Mayor Bloomberg’s congestion pricing plan at a 2 pm April 3 press conference inside the Staten Island Ferry Terminal.
Harrison, who is running against Vito Fossella, New York City’s only House Republican, does not oppose congestion reduction in theory, just Bloomberg’s plan.
According to Harrison using the congestion pricing stick to force working and middle class drivers into already overcrowded trains, buses and ferries, while the limo taking CEOs targeted by the plan will continue to drive in because they can easily absorb the fees, is unfair. He prefers a carrot approach of improving service first to get people off the roads. “The Mayor’s plan puts the cart before the horse,” says Harrison.
The plan is billed as a green initiative with the contradictory goals of reducing pollution and improving public transportation. “These goals will allegedly be accomplished by charging a fee to drive in lower Manhattan. The theory is that the fee will force many drivers off the road and, at the same time, the collected fees will be used to finance public transit improvements,“ says Harrison.
Harrison continues, “The contradiction here is glaring. The green objectives of the plan and the revenue raising objectives work at cross purposes. Every commuter forced off the road is one less driver to pay the fee. If the fee is set high enough to drive cars off the road and commuters into trains and buses, revenues will go down because there will be fewer drivers to pay the fee. There will be insufficient funds to pay for transit improvements. On the other hand, if fees are set so low that revenues are maximized, traffic and emissions will continue unabated and the green objectives will fail.”
“There is simply no incentive to set the congestion pricing fee at a level that would significantly reduce traffic and emissions. On the contrary, fees must actually be set to encourage a certain minimum level of traffic in the congestion pricing zone to sustain the cash flow.”
The Bloomberg plan’s exemption from filing an environmental impact statement causes Harrison to question congestion proposal’s “greenness”. “Exempting this plan from an Environmental Impact Statement under SEQRA is unconscionable. If it is truly a green initiative it should go through a green process - SEQRA. The fact that those who support the initiative want it waived is a good indication that they fear the results of such a review. There is no study whatsoever to indicate what will happen to metropolitan area traffic patterns as a result of this major change.”
I would support a congestion reduction plan that accomplishes green objectives. This plan is not that plan.”
As solutions to encourage mass transit use, Harrison advocates creating high speed ferries in Staten Island and Brooklyn and extending the Westshore railway into Jersey. In the interim, he advocates expanding current ferry and bus schedules to encourage people to avoid driving into Manhattan. Harrison will also discuss his proposals to eliminate the Verrazano toll for Congressional District residents on both sides of the bridge and collect from non-district residents with boothless technology similar to what the congestion pricing plan will use.
Labels: congestion pricing, Local, Steve Harrison







2 Comments:
There are so many innaccuracies in Harrison's statements, I wonder if he is even following the congestion pricing proposal. To point out a couple key ones:
"There is no study whatsoever to indicate what will happen to metropolitan area traffic patterns as a result of this major change.”
Actually, the most sophisticated and nationally accepted traffic modeling was used to do just that: study traffic patters. They all showed double-digit reductions in traffic inside and outside the zone. For example: a 32% reduction in Western Queens.
Harrison continues: "Exempting this plan from an Environmental Impact Statement under SEQRA is unconscionable. If it is truly a green initiative it should go through a green process - SEQRA."
Actually, every NYC environmental group(who also helped to write and get SEQRA passed I might add) are for congestion pricing. Moreover, the requirements in the legislation require an environmental review process that goes beyond what is required in SEQRA. Before CP would be put in place, an extension review process would take place and the City would be REQUIRED to mitigate any environmental problems uncovered during that environmental review process.
Harrison needs to read up on the facts before coming out against such an important issue for NYC.
April 02, 2008 11:16 PM
Anonymous, according to the Traffic Congestion Commission Report, Western Queens would experience a 6.1% decrease in Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)and a 38.6% improvement in stop and go traffic. The improvements for those of us on Staten Island are much more modest, a 1% decrease in VMT and a 12.3% improvement in stop and go traffic.
These numbers did not take into account having drivers from New Jersey pay a congestion pricing fee, which is now under consideration. How will this change impact Staten Island and Southwest Brooklyn?
The Commission's Report does evaluate whether traffic will increase in the Brooklyn Battery Tunnel now that there is no price advantage for using one of the East River Bridges? The Commission's Report does not evaluate the impact of drivers, who currently use the West Side Highway and FDR, now using the BQE?
For those who live on Staten Island and Southwest Brooklyn these are important questions.
April 03, 2008 7:58 PM
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home